Skip to main content

Kawalpreet Kaur

Title: Lecturer

Department: Mechanical Engineering

College: College of Engineering

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Texas at Arlington, 2023
    Major: Civil Engineering
    Dissertation: Testing and Evaluation of Polymeric Spray App Pressure Pipe Applications
  • MS, San Diego State University, 2018
    Major: Civil Engineering
    Dissertation: Bid Packaging Decisions in Construction Projects

Current Scheduled Teaching

CNET 2300.001Construction Graphics and ModelingSpring 2026
CNET 2300.101Construction Graphics and ModelingSpring 2026
CNET 4180.001Problems in Project ManagementSpring 2026
CNET 4190.001Quality Management in ConstructionSpring 2026
ENGR 2301.003StaticsSpring 2026
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

CNET 2300.501Construction Graphics and ModelingFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
CNET 2300.502Construction Graphics and ModelingFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
CNET 1160.001Construction Methods and MaterialsFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
CNET 1160.501Construction Methods and MaterialsFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
EMGT 5240.001Heavy Civil Construction ManagementFall 2025 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE