Skip to main content

Kerin K. Groves

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Management

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Texas A&M University-Commerce, 2016
    Major: Counseling
    Dissertation: The Role of Spirituality in Happy Fifty-Year Marriages
  • MS, UNT, 1999
    Major: Counseling
  • BSW, UNT, 1992
    Major: Social Work

Current Scheduled Teaching

BUSI 1200.012Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessSpring 8W1 2025 Syllabus
BUSI 1200.013Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessSpring 8W1 2025 Syllabus
BUSI 1200.028Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessSpring 8W2 2025 Syllabus
BUSI 1200.029Professional Development I Strategies for BusinessSpring 8W2 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

COUN 5610.002Addiction CounselingFall 2019 SPOT
RHAB 4075.001Drugs and AlcoholFall 2019 SPOT
RHAB 4375.001Addiction Counseling and GroupsSpring 2016 Syllabus SPOT
RHAB 4375.001Addiction Counseling and GroupsFall 2014 Syllabus
RHAB 4375.001Addiction Counseling and GroupsFall 2013 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Cartwright, A.D., Barrio-Minton, C., ReyesG., Groves, K.K., Abernathy, M. (2022). Empathy and social information processing with sexual offenders in community counseling programs. Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling. No. 1-13.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE