Skip to main content

Katharine Reed

Title: Lecturer

Department: Conducting and Ensembles

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MMus, University of Akron, 2022
    Major: Music Performance (Wind Conducting)
  • BMUS, Iowa State University, 2008
    Major: Music

Current Scheduled Teaching

MULB 5173.505Large Ensemble: BandFall 2026
MULB 1812.500Marching BandFall 2026 Syllabus
MULB 1812.502Marching BandFall 2026 Syllabus
MUAG 4050.002Symphonic Literature of the Wind BandFall 2026 Syllabus
MULB 1809.500Wind EnsembleFall 2026 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MULB 1813.500Concert BandSpring 2026 Syllabus SPOT
MULB 1813.505Concert BandSpring 2026 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 3800.003Fundamentals of ConductingSpring 2026 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 5805.001Fundamentals of ConductingSpring 2026 SPOT
MULB 5173Z.504Large Ensemble: BandSpring 2026 SPOT
MULB 1813.500Concert BandFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MULB 1813.506Concert BandFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MULB 1813.508Concert BandFall 8W2 2025
MUAG 3800.002Fundamentals of ConductingFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 5805.001Fundamentals of ConductingFall 2025 SPOT
MULB 1813.500Concert BandSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MULB 1813.505Concert BandSpring 2025 Syllabus
MULB 5173Z.504Large Ensemble: BandSpring 2025 SPOT
MULB 1813.506Concert BandFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE