Skip to main content

Krystal Turner

Title: Clinical Assistant Professor

Department: Counseling and Higher Education

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2024
    Major: Counseling
    Dissertation: Multiculturally and Historically Designed Child-Centered Play Therapy Rooms: A Comparison Study

Current Scheduled Teaching

COUN 5710.001Counseling TheoriesFall 2025
COUN 5720.402Internship in Counseling IFall 2025
COUN 5640.001Play Based Group and Family CounselingFall 2025
COUN 5900.703Special ProblemsFall 2025
COUN 5660.002Advanced Counseling SkillsSummer 10W 2025 SPOT
COUN 5790.001Counseling Culturally Diverse ClientsSummer 10W 2025 SPOT
COUN 5700.001Introduction to Play TherapySummer 10W 2025 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

COUN 5680.002Essential Skills in CounselingSpring 2025 SPOT
COUN 5000.001Filial/Family TherapySpring 2025 SPOT
COUN 5690.001Practicum in CounselingSpring 2025 SPOT
COUN 5790.001Counseling Culturally Diverse ClientsFall 2024 SPOT
COUN 5710.002Counseling TheoriesFall 2024 SPOT
COUN 5700.001Introduction to Play TherapyFall 2024 SPOT
COUN 3600.001Therapeutic PlaySpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE