Skip to main content

Karen M. Lackey

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Learning Technologies

College: College of Information

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2019
    Major: Learning Technologies
    Dissertation: American and Canadian Parents Perceptions of Virtual Education: A Case Study of K-12 Students Living in Saudi Arabia

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

LTEC 6800.030Special Topics in Learning TechnologiesSummer 10W 2024 SPOT
LTEC 5200.020New Technologies of InstructionFall 8W1 2023 SPOT
LTEC 1100.020Computer ApplicationsSummer 10W 2019 Syllabus SPOT
LTEC 5260.020Computer Graphics for Mediated CommunicationsSummer 3W1 2018 SPOT
LTEC 3220.020Computer Graphics in Education and TrainingSummer 3W1 2018 Syllabus SPOT
LTEC 5260.020Computer Graphics for Mediated CommunicationsSummer 3W1 2017 SPOT
LTEC 3220.020Computer Graphics in Education and TrainingSummer 3W1 2017 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE