Skip to main content

Keely N. Hayden

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Kinesiology, Health Promotion and Recreation

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

HLTH 2200.402Family Life and Human SexualityFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

KINE 4000.001Psychology of SportSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 4000.002Psychology of SportFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PHED 1000.904Scientific Principles and Practices of Health Related FitnessFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 4000.002Psychology of SportSpring 2023 SPOT
KINE 4000.002Psychology of SportFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 4000.003Psychology of SportSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
KINE 4000.003Psychology of SportFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Chapter

  • Barnes, C., Hayden, K.N., Martin, S.B. (2023). Recognition, prevention, and treatment of disordered eating and body dissatisfaction. Routledge Handbook of Mental Health in Elite Sport. Oxfordshire, Taylor & Francis/Routledge.. https://www.bookdepository.com/Routledge-Handbook-Mental-Health-Elite-Sports-Insa-Nixdorf/9780367567866?ref=grid-view&qid=1668022150897&sr=1-4
  • Zakrajsek, R.A., Bianco, A., Casey, T.B., Hayden, K.N., Martin, S.B. (2023). Mental techniques for injury prevention and rehabilitation. Routledge Handbook on Mental Health in Elite Sport. Oxfordshire, UK, Taylor & Francis. https://www.bookdepository.com/Routledge-Handbook-Mental-Health-Elite-Sports-Insa-Nixdorf/9780367567866?ref=grid-view&qid=1668022150897&sr=1-4
  • Journal Article

  • Martin, S.B., Hayden, K.N. (2024). Interprofessional healthcare teams: Promoting health-related quality of life through sport.. 2 (3) 1-3. Iris Publishers. https://irispublishers.com/ajssm/article-in-press.php
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE