Skip to main content

Kathryn B. Walther

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Technical Communication

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • GAC, University of North Texas, 2019
    Major: Teaching Technical Writing
  • MA, University of North Texas, 2016
    Major: Professional and Technical Communication
  • BS, Tarleton State University, 2006
    Major: Communications

Current Scheduled Teaching

TECM 4180.006Advanced Technical CommunicationSpring 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

TECM 2700.035Technical WritingFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 4180.302Advanced Technical CommunicationSummer 5W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.022Technical WritingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 4180.003Advanced Technical CommunicationFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.011Technical WritingSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.851Technical WritingSpring 3W1 2022 SPOT
TECM 4180.005Advanced Technical CommunicationFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.034Technical WritingFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.022Technical WritingSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.852Technical WritingSpring 3W1 2021 SPOT
TECM 2700.318Technical WritingFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 4180.002Advanced Technical CommunicationSpring 2020 Syllabus
TECM 2700.033Technical WritingFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE