Skip to main content

Kimberly R. Moore

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Information Science

College: College of Information

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2006
    Major: Library Science
    Specialization: Information Science
  • BS, University of North Texas, 2004
    Major: Information Science
    Specialization: Library Science

Current Scheduled Teaching

INFO 4430.401Information Resources for Young AdultsFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

INFO 4430.001Information Resources for Young AdultsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4430.001Information Resources for Young AdultsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4430.001Information Resources for Young AdultsFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5845.001Creating Online Content for Youth ServicesSummer 5W2 2021 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5845.005Creating Online Content for Youth ServicesSummer 5W2 2021 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4430.001Information Resources for Young AdultsFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5845.001Creating Online Content for Youth ServicesSummer 5W2 2020 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5845.005Creating Online Content for Youth ServicesSummer 5W2 2020 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4430.001Information Resources for Young AdultsFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5845.001Creating Online Content for Youth ServicesSummer 5W2 2019 SPOT
INFO 5845.005Creating Online Content for Youth ServicesSummer 5W2 2019 SPOT
INFO 4430.001Information Resources for Young AdultsFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4430.005Information Resources for Young AdultsFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5845.001Creating Online Content for Youth ServicesSummer 5W2 2018 SPOT
INFO 5845.005Creating Online Content for Youth ServicesSummer 5W2 2018 SPOT
INFO 4430.001Information Resources for Young AdultsFall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5845.001Creating Online Content for Youth ServicesSummer 5W2 2017 SPOT
INFO 5845.005Creating Online Content for Youth ServicesSummer 5W2 2017 SPOT
INFO 5960.002Library and Information Sciences Institute or SeminarSpring 2017 SPOT
INFO 5960.005Library and Information Sciences Institute or SeminarSpring 2017 SPOT
INFO 5960.012Library and Information Sciences Institute or SeminarSpring 2017 SPOT
INFO 5960.016Library and Information Sciences Institute or SeminarSpring 2017
INFO 5845.001Creating Online Content for Youth ServicesSummer 5W2 2016 SPOT
INFO 5845.005Creating Online Content for Youth ServicesSummer 5W2 2016 SPOT
INFO 5960.012Library and Information Sciences Institute or SeminarSpring 2016 SPOT
INFO 5960.016Library and Information Sciences Institute or SeminarSpring 2016 SPOT
SLIS 5960.012Library and Information Sciences Institute or SeminarSpring 2015
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Moore, K.R. (2020). Teaching Students 3D Design. Computers in Libraries. 40 (2) 32-37. Medford, New Jersey, Information Today, Inc.. http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/default.shtml
  • Moore, K.R. (2019). Tools and Tips for Helping Students Create ePortfolios. Computers in Libraries. 39 (8) 32-37. Medford, N.J., Information Today, Inc.. http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE