Skip to main content

Kevin Siefert

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Philosophy and Religion

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PHIL 2500.003Environment and SocietySpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 2500.004Environment and SocietySpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 2600.001Ethics in ScienceFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 2600.002Ethics in ScienceFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.001Introduction to PhilosophySummer 5W1 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 2600.001Ethics in ScienceSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 2600.002Ethics in ScienceSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.007Introduction to PhilosophyFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.008Introduction to PhilosophyFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.001Introduction to PhilosophySummer 5W1 2021 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.003Introduction to PhilosophySpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.004Introduction to PhilosophySpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 2050.201Introduction to LogicFall 2019 SPOT
PHIL 2050.205Introduction to LogicFall 2019 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE