Skip to main content

Kinshuk Sharma

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Management

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Purdue University, 2022
    Major: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • MS, Purdue University, 2017
    Major: Management
    Specialization: Human Resource Management

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MGMT 5140.401Organizational Behavior and AnalysisSpring 8W1 2025 SPOT
MGMT 5890.401Seminar in Compensation and Motivation TheorySpring 8W1 2025 SPOT
MGMT 5140.405Organizational Behavior and AnalysisFall 8W2 2024 SPOT
MGMT 5890.401Seminar in Compensation and Motivation TheoryFall 8W2 2024 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Tan, H.H., Schoorman, D., Sharma, K., Mayer, R.C. (2025). Towards a Psychometrically Sound and Culturally Invariant Measure of Propensity to Trust. Journal of Business And Psychology.
  • Ballinger, G.A., Schoorman, D., Sharma, K. (2024). What We Do While Waiting: The Experience of Vulnerability in Trusting Relationships.. Academy of Management Review.
  • Sharma, K., Schoorman, D., Ballinger, G.A. (2023). How Can It Be Made Right Again? A Review of Trust Repair Literature.. Journal of Management.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE