Skip to main content

Kevin S. Hawkins

Title: Assistant Dean

Department: Library - PS - Library Research Support Services

College: University of North Texas

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2003
    Major: library and information science
  • BA, University of Maryland, College Park, 2002
    Major: linguistics
  • BA, University of Maryland, College Park, 2002
    Major: Russian language and literature

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Abstracts and Proceedings

  • Hawkins, K.S., Miltenova, A., Baranov, V., Miklas, H., Fuchsbauer, J. (2019). Digital and Analytical Approaches to the Written Heritage: Proceedings of the 7th international conference El'Manuscript „Text Heritage and Information Technologies“. Sofia, Gutenberg Publishing House.
  • Book Chapter

  • Hawkins, K.S. (2015). The Evolution of Publishing Agreements at the University of Michigan Library. Getting the Word Out: Academic Libraries as Scholarly Publishers. 113-118. Chicago, IL, Association of College and Research Libraries. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/booksanddigitalresources/digital/9780838986981_getting_OA.pdf
  • Commentary

  • Hawkins, K.S. (2019). Creating a Library Publishing Program for Scholarly Books: Your Options Are Limited. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 7 (General Issue) eP2262. Forest Grove, OR, Pacific University Libraries. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1438965/
  • Journal Article

  • Judkins, J., Hawkins, K.S. (2021). Formulating a scalable approach to patron-requested digitization in archives. The Journal of Copyright In Education and Librarianship.
  • Hawkins, K.S., Burggren, W.W., Halbert, M.D., Madasu, D.K. (2018). Marketing via Email Solicitation by Predatory (and Legitimate) Journals: An Evaluation of Quality, Frequency and Relevance. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 6 (General Issue) eP2246. Pacific University Libraries. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1393803/
  • Hawkins, K.S. (2017). "Achieving Financial Sustainability: Are We Asking the Wrong Questions?. The Journal of Electronic Publishing. 20 (2) Ann Arbor, MI, Michigan Publishing. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1164533/
  • Hawkins, K.S., Dalmau, M. (2015). 'Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated': Findings from the TEI in Libraries Survey. Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative. n/a (8) n/a. Text Encoding Initiative Consortium.
  • Hawkins, K.S. (2014). The Evolution of Publishing Agreements at the University of Michigan Library. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 2 (4) Pacific University Libraries.
  • Magazine/Trade Publication

  • Hawkins, K.S. (2015). How We Pay for Publishing. Other. 26 (6) http://www.against-the-grain.com/2015/02/how-we-pay-for-publishing-by-kevin-s-hawkins-director-of-library-publishing-university-of-north-texas-libraries/
  • Translation or Transcription

  • Hawkins, K.S. (2019). Petersburg. Encyclopedia of Diderot and d'Alembert Collaborative Translation Project. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.did2222.0003.707
  • Hawkins, K.S. (2017). Slavs. Encyclopedia of Diderot and d'Alembert Collaborative Translation Project. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.did2222.0003.587
  • Pechenina, A. (2016). Transcript and Translation of Sci-Hub Presentation. http://openaccess.unt.edu/symposium/2016/info/transcript-and-translation-sci-hub-presentation
  • Webpage

  • Hawkins, K.S. (2014). Introduction to the TEI Header. http://www.ultraslavonic.info/intro-to-tei-header/
  • White Paper

  • Hawkins, K.S., O'Leary, B., Watkinson, C., Montgomery, L., Neylon, C., Skinner, K. (2019). Exploring Open Access Ebook Usage. New York, NY, Book Industry Study Group.
  • Hawkins, K.S., Dalmau, M., Mylonas, E., Bauman, S. (2018). Best Practices for TEI in Libraries. http://purl.oclc.org/NET/teiinlibraries

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Hawkins, K.S. (Principal), Welzenbach, R. (Co-Principal), Skinner, K. (Co-Principal), Montgomery, L. (Co-Principal), Neylon, C. (Co-Principal), O'Leary, B. (Co-Principal), "Developing a Data Trust for Open Acces Ebook Usage," sponsored by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, International, $1200000 Funded. (2020 - 2021).
  • Hawkins, K.S. (Principal), Martin, J.E. (Co-Principal), "Broadening access to books on Texas and Oklahoma," sponsored by National Endowment for the Humanities, Federal, $95599 Funded. (2016 - 2019).
  • Hawkins, K.S. (Co-Principal), Watkinson, C. (Principal), Montgomery, L. (Co-Principal), O'Leary, B. (Co-Principal), "Understanding OA Ebook Usage: Toward a Common Framework," sponsored by Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, Private, $93000 Funded. (2018 - 2019).
  • Hawkins, K.S. (Principal), "Developing a Data Trust for Open Access Ebook Usage," sponsored by Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, NFP, Funded. (2019 - 2022).
  • Hawkins, K.S. (Principal), "Understanding OA Ebook Usage: Toward a Common Framework," sponsored by University of Michigan, NFP, Funded. (2018 - 2019).
  • Grant - Service

  • Martin, J.E. (Co-Principal), Hawkins, K.S. (Principal), "Broadening Access to Books on Texas and Oklahoma," sponsored by National Endowment for the Humanities, FED, Funded. (2016 - 2019).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE