Faculty Profile

Kevin Hawkins

Kevin Hawkins

Title
Assistant Dean
Department
Library - PS - Library Research Support Services
College
University of North Texas

    

Education

MS, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2003.
Major: library and information science
BA, University of Maryland, College Park, 2002.
Major: linguistics
BA, University of Maryland, College Park, 2002.
Major: Russian language and literature

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

No previous courses available.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Abstracts and Proceedings
Hawkins, K. S., Miltenova, A., Baranov, V., Miklas, H., Fuchsbauer, J. (2019). Digital and Analytical Approaches to the Written Heritage: Proceedings of the 7th international conference El'Manuscript „Text Heritage and Information Technologies“. Sofia: Gutenberg Publishing House.
Book Chapter
Hawkins, K. S. (2015). The Evolution of Publishing Agreements at the University of Michigan Library. Getting the Word Out: Academic Libraries as Scholarly Publishers. 113-118. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/booksanddigitalresources/digital/9780838986981_getting_OA.pdf
Commentary
Hawkins, K. S. (2019). Creating a Library Publishing Program for Scholarly Books: Your Options Are Limited. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 7(General Issue), eP2262. Forest Grove, OR: Pacific University Libraries. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1438965/
Journal Article
Judkins, J., Hawkins, K. S. (2021). Formulating a scalable approach to patron-requested digitization in archives. The Journal of Copyright In Education and Librarianship.
Hawkins, K. S., Burggren, W. W., Halbert, M. D., Madasu, D. K. (2018). Marketing via Email Solicitation by Predatory (and Legitimate) Journals: An Evaluation of Quality, Frequency and Relevance. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 6(General Issue), eP2246. Pacific University Libraries. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1393803/
Hawkins, K. S. (2017). "Achieving Financial Sustainability: Are We Asking the Wrong Questions?. The Journal of Electronic Publishing. 20(2), . Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Publishing. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1164533/
Hawkins, K. S., Dalmau, M. (2015). 'Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated': Findings from the TEI in Libraries Survey. Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative. n/a(8), n/a. Text Encoding Initiative Consortium.
Hawkins, K. S. (2014). The Evolution of Publishing Agreements at the University of Michigan Library. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 2(4), . Pacific University Libraries.
Magazine/Trade Publication
Hawkins, K. S. (2015). How We Pay for Publishing. Other. 26(6), . http://www.against-the-grain.com/2015/02/how-we-pay-for-publishing-by-kevin-s-hawkins-director-of-library-publishing-university-of-north-texas-libraries/
Translation or Transcription
Hawkins, K. S. (2019). Petersburg. Encyclopedia of Diderot and d'Alembert Collaborative Translation Project. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.did2222.0003.707
Hawkins, K. S. (2017). Slavs. Encyclopedia of Diderot and d'Alembert Collaborative Translation Project. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.did2222.0003.587
Pechenina, A. (2016). Transcript and Translation of Sci-Hub Presentation. http://openaccess.unt.edu/symposium/2016/info/transcript-and-translation-sci-hub-presentation
Webpage
Hawkins, K. S. (2014). Introduction to the TEI Header. http://www.ultraslavonic.info/intro-to-tei-header/
White Paper
Hawkins, K. S., O'Leary, B., Watkinson, C., Montgomery, L., Neylon, C., Skinner, K. (2019). Exploring Open Access Ebook Usage. New York, NY: Book Industry Study Group.
Hawkins, K. S., Dalmau, M., Mylonas, E., Bauman, S. (2018). Best Practices for TEI in Libraries. http://purl.oclc.org/NET/teiinlibraries

Awarded Grants

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

Grant - Research
Hawkins, K. S. (Principal), Welzenbach, R. (Co-Principal), Skinner, K. (Co-Principal), Montgomery, L. (Co-Principal), Neylon, C. (Co-Principal), O'Leary, B. (Co-Principal), "Developing a Data Trust for Open Acces Ebook Usage," Sponsored by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, International, $1200000 Funded. (January 1, 2020December 31, 2021).
Hawkins, K. S. (Principal), Martin, J. E. (Co-Principal), "Broadening access to books on Texas and Oklahoma," Sponsored by National Endowment for the Humanities, Federal, $95599 Funded. (January 1, 2016December 31, 2019).
Hawkins, K. S. (Co-Principal), Watkinson, C. (Principal), Montgomery, L. (Co-Principal), O'Leary, B. (Co-Principal), "Understanding OA Ebook Usage: Toward a Common Framework," Sponsored by Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, Private, $93000 Funded. (June 1, 2018May 31, 2019).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE