Skip to main content

Kyle Steadham

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Management

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • EdD, Texas A&M University-Commerce, 2006
    Major: Supervision Curriculum & Instruction - Higher Education
  • MEd, Texas A&M University-Commerce, 2004
    Major: Secondary Education
  • MBA, University of Dallas, 1998
    Major: Human Resource Management

Current Scheduled Teaching

MGMT 4470.401LeadershipSpring 2025 Syllabus
MGMT 3720.407Organizational BehaviorSpring 2025 Syllabus
MGMT 4470.402LeadershipFall 2024 Syllabus
MGMT 3720.408Organizational BehaviorFall 2024 Syllabus
MGMT 3720.412Organizational BehaviorFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MGMT 4210.001E Management: Managing in a Digital EconomySpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 3720.004Organizational BehaviorSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 3720.006Organizational BehaviorFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 3720.009Organizational BehaviorFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 3860.002Human Resource ManagementSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE