Skip to main content

Kathleen Wiggins

Title: Lecturer

Department: Rehabilitation and Health Services

College: College of Health and Public Service

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MSW, University of Southern California, 2020
    Major: Social Work
  • MSG, University of Southern California, 2017
    Major: Aging Services Management
  • PhD, University of Phoenix, 2012
    Major: Health Administration
  • MBA, University of Phoenix, 2005
    Major: Health Care Management

Current Scheduled Teaching

HLSV 5940.400CapstoneSpring 2025
HLSV 5710.400Theories and Measures for Health and WellnessSpring 2025
HLSV 5940.001CapstoneFall 2024
HLSV 5550.401Health Insurance and Managed CareFall 2024
HLSV 5720.400Human Resources ManagementFall 2024
HLSV 5820.001Marketing Health ServicesFall 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

HLSV 5400.900Health Delivery SystemsSummer 10W 2024 SPOT
HLSV 5450.900Health Services AdministrationSpring 2024 SPOT
HLSV 5450.902Health Services AdministrationSpring 2024 SPOT
HLSV 5720.900Human Resources ManagementFall 2023 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE