Skip to main content

Kayla Carrigan

Title: Clinical Assistant Professor

Department: Psychology

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2018
    Major: Counseling Psychology
    Dissertation: Self-Weighing: Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Relations to Retired Female Athletes' Disordered Eating Attitudes and Behaviors
  • MS, University of North Texas, 2015
    Major: Psychology
    Dissertation: To Weigh or Not to Weigh?: Relation to Disordered Eating Attitudes and Behaviors Amongst Female Collegiate Athletes
  • BA, University of Delaware, 2012
    Major: Psychology

Current Scheduled Teaching

PSYC 4600.001History and SystemsSpring 2025
PSYC 6830.707PracticumSpring 2025
KINE 5850.701Sport and Exercise Psychology PracticumSpring 2025
PSYC 6820.707PracticumFall 2024
PSYC 6820.714PracticumFall 2024
KINE 5850.701Sport and Exercise Psychology PracticumFall 2024

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PSYC 5850.002Sport and Exercise Psychology PracticumSpring 2024 SPOT
PSYC 5850.001Sport and Exercise Psychology PracticumFall 2023 SPOT
PSYC 5850.002Sport and Exercise Psychology PracticumSpring 2023 SPOT
PSYC 5850.002Sport and Exercise Psychology PracticumFall 2022 SPOT
PSYC 3480.002Adult Development and AgingSpring 2015 Syllabus
PSYC 3480.001Adult Development and AgingFall 2014 Syllabus
AGER 3480.001Psychology of Adult Development and AgingFall 2014 Syllabus
PSYC 3480.001Adult Development and AgingFall 2013 Syllabus
AGER 3480.001Psychology of Adult Development and AgingFall 2013 Syllabus

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Carrigan, K., Petrie, T.A., , C. (2015). To Weigh or Not to Weigh? Relation to Disordered Eating Attitudes and Behaviors Amongst Female Collegiate Athletes. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE