Skip to main content

Louanne Greer

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Teacher Education and Administration

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MMus, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 2005
    Major: Music (Musicology)
    Dissertation: Crossing Over in the 21st Century: New Perspectives on Classical Music Through the Work of Mark O'Connor, Edgar Meyer, and Bela Fleck.

Current Scheduled Teaching

MULB 1805.505OrchestraSpring 2026
MUAG 1221.502Strings ClassSpring 2026
MULB 1805.505OrchestraFall 2025 Syllabus
MUAG 1121.500Strings ClassFall 2025 Syllabus
MUAG 1121.502Strings ClassFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUAG 1221.502Strings ClassSpring 2025 SPOT
EDCI 4148.784Student Teaching for Music Education MajorsSpring 2025 Syllabus
EDME 4103.784Student Teaching in Grades 4 8Spring 2025 Syllabus
MUAG 1121.500Strings ClassFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 1121.502Strings ClassFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE