Skip to main content

Lynne M. Simpson

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Information Science

College: College of Information

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2009
    Major: Information Sciences
    Dissertation: Self- Perceived Information Seeking Skills and Self-Esteem in Adolescents by Race and Gender

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

INFO 5200.001Information OrganizationSpring 2024 SPOT
INFO 5200.600Information OrganizationSpring 2024 SPOT
INFO 5200.001Information OrganizationFall 2023 SPOT
INFO 5200.001Information OrganizationSpring 2023 SPOT
INFO 5200.001Information OrganizationFall 2021 SPOT
INFO 5200.005Information OrganizationFall 2021 SPOT
INFO 5000.080Information and Knowledge ProfessionsSpring 2020
INFO 5000.085Information and Knowledge ProfessionsSpring 2020
INFO 5000.007Information and Knowledge ProfessionsFall 2019 SPOT
INFO 5200.009Information OrganizationSummer 10W 2019 SPOT
INFO 5000.009Information and Knowledge ProfessionsSpring 2019 SPOT
INFO 5200.007Information OrganizationSpring 2018 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE