Skip to main content

Linda M. Voracek

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Merchandising and Digital Retailing

College: College of Merchandising, Hospitality and Tourism

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • BAAS, University of North Texas, 2015
    Major: Applied Technology and Performance Improvement

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

RETL 4330.001Consumer Analytics and Data VisualizationSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MDSE 2750.002Consumers in a Global MarketFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MDSE 4010.002Global SourcingFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MDSE 2750.002Consumers in a Global MarketFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MDSE 2750.501Consumers in a Global MarketFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MDSE 4660.001Advanced ApplicationSummer 5W2 2021 Syllabus SPOT
RETL 4330.001Consumer Analytics and Data VisualizationSummer 5W1 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MDSE 2350.001Trend Analysis and ForecastingSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MDSE 4660.003Advanced ApplicationFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
RETL 4330.001Consumer Analytics and Data VisualizationSummer 5W1 2020 Syllabus SPOT
RETL 4330.001Consumer Analytics and Data VisualizationSpring 2020 Syllabus
RETL 3880.001Profit Centered RetailingSpring 2020 Syllabus
MDSE 3750.001Consumer StudiesFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MDSE 2350.001Trend Analysis and ForecastingFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MDSE 3510.001Profit Centered MerchandisingSummer 5W1 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MDSE 3510.301Profit Centered MerchandisingSummer 5W1 2019 SPOT
RETL 3880.001Profit Centered RetailingSpring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MDSE 2350.001Trend Analysis and ForecastingSpring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE