Skip to main content

Laura Vu

Title: Clinical Assistant Professor

Department: ADA - Advanced Data Analytics

College: University of North Texas

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • DENG, Southern Methodist University, 2022
    Major: Engineering Management
    Dissertation: "Value-Oriented Business Process Management: Using a Process Reengineering Approach to Identify Productivity Improvement Requirements and Justify Strategic Capital Investment"
  • MS, Southern Methodist University, 2006
    Major: Engineering Management
  • BS, Texas A&M University, 2003
    Major: Industrial Engineering

Current Scheduled Teaching

ADTA 4130.400Data Analytics and Computational Statistics 1Spring 8W1 2025 Syllabus
INSD 5940.002MA Interdisciplinary Capstone ExperienceSpring 2025 Syllabus
INSD 5940.401MA Interdisciplinary Capstone ExperienceSpring 2025 Syllabus
INSD 5941.001MS Interdisciplinary Capstone ExperienceSpring 2025 Syllabus
INSD 5941.401MS Interdisciplinary Capstone ExperienceSpring 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

APMG 4020.530Organizational Contexts and ChangeFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
APMG 3120.520Problem AnalysisFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE