UNT | University of North Texas
Faculty Information System

Main menu

Lauren Kelly

Lauren Kelly

Title
Senior Lecturer
Department
Educational Psychology
College
College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Click Here to View Faculty CV

Current Scheduled Teaching*

HDFS 2313.020, Courtship and Marriage, Spring 3W1 2019
HDFS 2313.020, Courtship and Marriage, Spring 1 2019
HDFS 2313.021, Courtship and Marriage, Spring 1 2019
HDFS 3423.020, Family, School, and Community, Spring 1 2019
HDFS 2313.002, Courtship and Marriage, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus
HDFS 2313.003, Courtship and Marriage, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus
HDFS 4323.001, Family Law and Public Policy, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus
HDFS 3423.001, Family, School, and Community, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

HDFS 2313.020, Courtship and Marriage, Summer 5W2 2018 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 3423.021, Family, School, and Community, Summer 10W 2018 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 2313.001, Courtship and Marriage, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 2313.020, Courtship and Marriage, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 4323.001, Family Law and Public Policy, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 3423.001, Family, School, and Community, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 2313.002, Courtship and Marriage, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 2313.003, Courtship and Marriage, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 3423.001, Family, School, and Community, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 3423.020, Family, School, and Community, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,  
Overall
Summative Rating1		 Challenge and
Engagement Index2		 Response Rate
0
out of 5		 0
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
A Challenge and Engagement Index of "n/a" means
there were not enough student responses to calculate a score.
  • 1 Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • 2 Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE