Skip to main content

Lavinia Florentina Pieptea

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, USA, 2022
    Major: Mathematics
  • BS, University of Bucharest, Romania, 2019
    Major: Mathematics

Current Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1100.165AlgebraFall 2024 Syllabus
MATH 1190.010Business CalculusFall 2024 Syllabus
MATH 1180.007College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsFall 2024 Syllabus
MATH 1180.310College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsFall 2024 Syllabus
MATH 1180.320College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsFall 2024 Syllabus
UGMT 1300.311Tutorial Option C in Developmental MathematicsFall 2024 Syllabus
UGMT 1300.312Tutorial Option C in Developmental MathematicsFall 2024 Syllabus
UGMT 1300.321Tutorial Option C in Developmental MathematicsFall 2024 Syllabus
UGMT 1300.322Tutorial Option C in Developmental MathematicsFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

INFO 5731.021Computational Methods for Information SystemsFall 2023 SPOT
INFO 5501.001Fundamentals of Data AnalyticsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1720.111Calculus IISpring 2022 SPOT
MATH 1720.112Calculus IISpring 2022 SPOT
MATH 1100.110AlgebraSummer 5W2 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1100.111AlgebraSummer 5W2 2021 Syllabus
MATH 1100.112AlgebraSummer 5W2 2021 Syllabus
MATH 1190.003Business CalculusSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Chen, H., Pieptea, L., Ding, J. (2022). Construction and Evaluation of a High-Quality Corpus for Legal Intelligence Using Semiautomated Approaches. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. 71 (2) 1-17. IEEE.
  • Pieptea, L., Ding, J. (2020). Using latent features for building an interpretable recommendation system.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE