Skip to main content

Lacey R. Smith

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Teacher Education and Administration

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • EdD, Dallas Baptist University, 2016
    Major: Education
    Specialization: Educational Leadership
    Dissertation: The Effect of Standards-Based Grading on Student Achievement: A Correlational Investigation
  • MEd, Texas A&M University - Commerce, 2008
    Major: Education
    Specialization: Educational Leadership
  • BS, University of Texas at Austin, 2002
    Major: Communication Studies
    Specialization: Corporate Communication

Current Scheduled Teaching

EDLE 5620.486Administration and Leadership for Student Educational ServicesFall 8W1 2024
EDLE 5680.484Administration of the K 12 CurriculumFall 8W2 2024
EDLE 5650.482Professional Development and SupervisionFall 8W2 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDLE 5630.085Organizational Change and School ImprovementSummer 8W1 2024 SPOT
EDCI 5020.031Curriculum Development for Culturally Diverse LearnersFall 2023 SPOT
EDEE 1010.003Teaching as Advocacy for EquitySpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 1010.006Teaching as Advocacy for EquityFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 5130.030Schooling in a Multicultural SocietySpring 2022 SPOT
EDCI 5130.031Schooling in a Multicultural SocietySpring 2020
EDCI 5130.031Schooling in a Multicultural SocietySpring 2019 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE