Skip to main content

Leigh T. Messenger

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Technical Communication

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MEM, Duke University, 2012
    Major: Human Health & the Environment; Business & the Environment; Policy

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

TECM 2700.018Technical WritingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.020Technical WritingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.004Technical WritingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.020Technical WritingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.014Technical WritingSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.020Technical WritingSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.016Technical WritingSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.020Technical WritingSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.011Technical WritingFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.019Technical WritingFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.007Technical WritingSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.008Technical WritingSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.010Technical WritingFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.011Technical WritingFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.001Technical WritingSpring 2020 Syllabus
TECM 2700.004Technical WritingSpring 2020 Syllabus
TECM 2700.001Technical WritingFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.005Technical WritingFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE