Skip to main content

Lok-Sze Wong

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Teacher Education and Administration

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Michigan, 2015
    Major: Educational Administration and Policy
    Dissertation: Attempting to Realize the Coordination and Continuous Improvement of Instruction
  • MA, University of Michigan, 2011
    Major: Research Methods
    Specialization: Educational Studies
  • MA, California State University, Los Angeles, 2005
    Major: Educational Foundations
  • BA, California State University, Los Angeles, 1999
    Major: Psychology

Current Scheduled Teaching

EDLE 6950.714Dissertation in PracticeSpring 2025
EDLE 5330.482Instructional LeadershipSpring 8W1 2025
EDLE 5330.486Instructional LeadershipSpring 8W1 2025
EDLE 5680.480Administration of the K 12 CurriculumFall 8W2 2024
EDLE 6100.501Change Leadership in Complex Systems and OrganizationFall 2024
EDLE 6950.716Dissertation in PracticeFall 2024
EDLE 6950.717Dissertation in PracticeFall 8W2 2024
EDLE 6910.004Special ProblemsFall 8W2 2024
EDLE 6910.005Special ProblemsFall 8W2 2024
EDLE 6910.006Special ProblemsFall 8W2 2024

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDLE 6900.715Special ProblemsSummer 10W 2024
EDLE 6950.714Dissertation in PracticeSpring 2024
EDLE 5330.082Instructional LeadershipSpring 8W1 2024 SPOT
EDLE 5680.080Administration of the K 12 CurriculumFall 8W2 2023 SPOT
EDLE 6100.501Change Leadership in Complex Systems and OrganizationFall 2023 SPOT
EDLE 5330.082Instructional LeadershipSpring 8W1 2023 SPOT
EDLE 5680.085Administration of the K 12 CurriculumFall 8W2 2022 SPOT
EDLE 6100.001Theories of Organizational Development and ReformFall 2022 SPOT
EDLE 5330.083Instructional LeadershipSpring 8W1 2022 SPOT
EDLE 6100.500Theories of Organizational Development and ReformSpring 2022 SPOT
EDLE 5680.087Administration of the K 12 CurriculumFall 8W2 2021 SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Chapter

  • Sampson, C., Wong, L. (2023). Using qualitative data analysis software to help explore critical research questions: A tool, not a replacement. Handbook of Critical Education Research: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Emerging Approaches.
  • Warr, M., Mishra, P., Scragg, B., Powers, J.M., Wong, L. (2022). Complicating design thinking in education: A university-school district partnership to design a school for the future. Design Thinking: Research, Innovation, and Implementation.
  • Sampson, C., Cervantes-Soon, C., Demps, D.M., Estrella, A., Wong, L. (2021). A call from Mothers of Color for true family engagement. The Pandemic Reader: Exposing Social (In)justice in the Time of COVID-19.
  • Huguet, A., Wong, L., Harrison, C.W., Coburn, C.E., Spillane, J.P. (2018). Research use in schools: A framework for understanding research use in school-level decision making. The SAGE Handbook of School Organization. 618-631.
  • Encyclopedia Article

  • Wong, L., Huguet, A., Harrison, C.W., Coburn, C.E., Spillane, J.P. (2022). School leaders’ use of research: Viewing research use in decision making through an organizational lens. International Encyclopedia of Education (4th ed.).
  • Journal Article

  • Johnson, D.D., Roberts, L., Wong, L., Ebejer, M. (2023). Consequential issues of censoring curriculum: Who has the right to ban what's read?. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership. Special Issue: Critical Cases in Antiracist Leadership. 26 (4) 62-74.
  • Roberts, L., Ebejer, M., Wong, L., Johnson, D.D. (2023). Critical cases for antiracist leadership: A contribution to the movement. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership. 26 (4) 3-9.
  • Wong, L. (2023). Accomplishing system reforms by minding the details: Developing understandings for collective practice. American Journal of Education. 129 (3) 383-412.
  • Powers, J.M., Wong, L. (2022). Necessary risk: Addressing precarity by re-envisioning teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration and History. 54 (1) 105-120.
  • Wong, L., Mishra, P. (2021). Reforming our school systems around a humanizing curriculum: Schooling during and after COVID-19. ECNU Review of Education. 4 (4) 890-898.
  • Wong, L., Coburn, C.E., Kamel, A. (2020). How central office leaders influence school leaders’ decision making: Unpacking power dynamics in two school-based decision-making systems. Peabody Journal of Education. 95 (4) 392-407.
  • Wong, L. (2019). Administrators’ unintentional sensegiving and system reform outcomes. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 27 (3) 1-28.
  • Holmstrom, K., Wong, L., Krumm, A. (2015). No need to talk about teaching: Examining the effects that an instruction and assessment system has on collaborating teachers' discourse. Leadership and Policy in Schools. 14 (1) 104-133.
  • Magazine/Trade Publication

  • Sampson, C., Wong, L., Estrella, A., Demps, D.M., Cervantes-, C. (2020). A call from Black and Brown mothers for true family engagement.
  • Research Report

  • Farrell, C.C., Shewchuk, S.J., Malin, J.R., Farley-Ripple, E., Wong, L., Kaiser, L., Neal, J.W., Brutzman, B., Brooks, D., Abodunrin, A. (2024). A Critical Ecological Perspective on the Wallace Foundation Research Production, Diffusion, and Use: Phase 2 Analytic Memo (Advice to The Wallace Foundation: Ideas from Communication Partners, Researchers/Authors, and Current and Prior Wallace Staff).
  • Farrell, C.C., Malin, J.R., Shewchuk, S.J., Farley-Ripple, E., Wong, L., Neal, J.W., Kaiser, L., Brutzman, B., Brooks, D., Abodunrin, A. (2024). A Critical Ecological Perspective on the Wallace Foundation Research Production, Diffusion, and Use: Phase 2 Memo (Knowledge Mobilization and Perceived Research Use).
  • Wong, L., Neal, J.W., Brutzman, B., Shewchuk, S.J., Malin, J., Abodunrin, A., Brooks, D., Farley-Ripple, E., Farrell, C. (2023). A Critical Ecological Perspective on The Wallace Foundation Research Production, Diffusion, and Use: Phase I Analytic Memo.
  • Fossum, A., , L. (2021). Principled innovation reflections report: Analysis from the Summer Lead Teachers Workshop.
  • Wong, L., Piepgrass, N., Bertrand, M. (2020). Student and alumni survey report: Program evaluation for the Educational Leadership Redesign Committee.
  • Coburn, C.E., Spillane, J.P., Bohannon, A.X., Allen, A., Ceperich, R., Beneke, A., Wong, L. (2020). The role of organizational routines in research use in four large urban school districts (Technical Report No. 5).
  • Wong, L. (2019). How does central office guidance influence school-level decision-making in school districts that emphasize school-level autonomy?.
  • Wong, L., Allen, A. (2018). How external partners support instructional improvement in mathematics and literacy in (anonymous district).
  • Technical Report

  • Coburn, C.E., Spillane, J.P., Bohannon, A.X., Allen, A., Ceperich, R., Beneke, A., Wong, L. (2020). The role of organizational routines in research use in four large urban school districts.
  • Webpage

  • Wong, L., Huguet, A., Harrison, C.W., Coburn, C., Spillane, J.P. (2020). Viewing educational decision making through an organizational lens. http://ncrpp.org/blog/2020/viewing-research-use-in-decision-making-through-an-organizational-lens

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Wong, L. (Principal), Farley-Ripple, E. (Principal), Farrell, C.C. (Principal), Neal, J.W. (Principal), Malin, J. (Principal), "A Critical, Ecological Perspective on the Wallace Foundation Research Production, Diffusion, and Use," sponsored by The Wallace Foundation, National, $636298 Funded. (2023 - 2025).
  • Wong, L. (Principal), Katzman, L. (Principal), "Study of District Leaders of Special Education," sponsored by Goalbook, Private, $43000 Funded. (2022 - 2024).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE