Skip to main content

Leonardo Zuno Fernandez

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Music History, Theory and Ethnomusicology

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MM, Southern Methodist University, 2007
    Major: Music Theory / Thesis: 'Beethoven's Compositional Tendencies in Selected Sonata-Allegro Movements for Piano'
  • MM, Southern Methodist University, 2005
    Major: Piano Performance and Pedagogy
  • BM, Dallas Baptist University, 2003
    Major: Piano Performance

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUTH 1510.008Aural Skills IISpring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 2410.007Aural Skills IIIFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 2410.009Aural Skills IIIFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 2410.002Aural Skills IIISpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 2510.003Aural Skills IVSpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 2510.001Aural Skills IVFall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 2510.005Aural Skills IVFall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1510.008Aural Skills IISpring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1510.009Aural Skills IISpring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 2410.002Aural Skills IIIFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 2410.003Aural Skills IIIFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1510.002Aural Skills IISpring 2016 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1510.003Aural Skills IISpring 2016 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1410.010Aural Skills IFall 2015 Syllabus SPOT
MUTH 1410.012Aural Skills IFall 2015 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Popular Press Article

  • Leonardo Zuno. (2006).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE