Skip to main content

Jalil Arif

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Philosophy and Religion

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • Diploma (International), University of Sargodha - Pakistan, 2018
    Major: Sociology

Current Scheduled Teaching

PHIL 2500.003Environment and SocietySpring 2026
PHIL 2500.004Environment and SocietySpring 2026
PHIL 2500.003Environment and SocietyFall 2025 Syllabus
PHIL 2500.004Environment and SocietyFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PHIL 2600.402Ethics in ScienceSummer 5W2 2025 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 3450.401Philosophy of TechnologySummer 5W1 2025 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.001Introduction to PhilosophySpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.002Introduction to PhilosophySpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.001Introduction to PhilosophyFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.002Introduction to PhilosophyFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.002Introduction to PhilosophySummer 5W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 2600.003Ethics in ScienceSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 2600.004Ethics in ScienceSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 2600.003Ethics in ScienceFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 2600.004Ethics in ScienceFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE