Faculty Profile

Mary Johnson

Title
Lecturer
Department
Art Foundations
College
College of Visual Arts and Design

    

Education

MFA, State University of New York at Buffalo, 2013.
Major: Drawing and Painting, Visual Studies
BA, Gordon College, 2008.
Major: Painting

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

ART 1600.001, Foundations: Perception and Translation, Spring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1600.105, Foundations: Perception and Translation, Spring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ASTU 3201.502, Intermediate Drawing and Painting: Rotating Topics, Spring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1600.001, Foundations: Perception and Translation, Spring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1600.401, Foundations: Perception and Translation, Spring 2021
ART 1600.001, Foundations: Perception and Translation, Fall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1600.100, Foundations: Perception and Translation, Fall 2020
ART 1600.401, Foundations: Perception and Translation, Fall 2020
ART 1600.402, Foundations: Perception and Translation, Fall 2020
ART 1510.001, Drawing II, Spring 2020 Syllabus
ART 1510.512, Drawing II, Spring 2020
ART 1510.001, Drawing II, Fall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1510.506, Drawing II, Fall 2019 SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE