Skip to main content

Melanie A. Kneen

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Geography and the Environment

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Texas at Dallas, 2014
    Major: Geosciences

Current Scheduled Teaching

GEOG 1710.001Earth ScienceSpring 2025
GEOG 1710.004Earth ScienceSpring 2025
GEOG 1710.005Earth ScienceSpring 2025
GEOL 1610.004Introduction to GeologySpring 2025
GEOG 1710.003Earth ScienceFall 2024 Syllabus
GEOG 1710.585Earth ScienceFall SDC 2024 Syllabus
GEOG 1710.595Earth ScienceFall SDC 2024 Syllabus
GEOL 3000.001Geology of TexasFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

GEOG 1710.001Earth ScienceSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
GEOG 1710.002Earth ScienceSpring 2024 SPOT
GEOG 1710.004Earth ScienceSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
GEOG 1710.005Earth ScienceSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
GEOL 1610.004Introduction to GeologySpring 2024 Syllabus
GEOG 1710.581Earth ScienceFall SDC 2023 Syllabus SPOT
GEOG 1710.585Earth ScienceFall SDC 2023 Syllabus SPOT
GEOG 1710.591Earth ScienceFall SDC 2023 Syllabus SPOT
GEOG 1710.595Earth ScienceFall SDC 2023 Syllabus SPOT
GEOL 1610.002Introduction to GeologyFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
GEOG 1710.003Earth ScienceSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
GEOG 1710.004Earth ScienceSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
GEOG 1710.003Earth ScienceFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
GEOG 1710.006Earth ScienceFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
GEOL 1610.001Introduction to GeologySpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE