Skip to main content

Michael Kuban

Title: Lecturer

Department: Management

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • DBA, Grenoble Ecole De Management, 2024
    Major: Business Administration
    Specialization: HR, Organization Theory & Management Education
    Dissertation: Faculty members perceptions on the strategic need for an athletic department in institutions of higher education: An analysis of the University of Dallas
  • MEd, Texas A&M University, 2011
    Major: Educational Administration
  • MBA, Texas A&M University, 1996
    Major: Business Administration
  • BBA, East Texas Baptist University, 1992
    Major: Business Administration

Current Scheduled Teaching

BUSI 4940.003Business PolicySpring 2025
BUSI 4940.004Business PolicySpring 2025
BUSI 4940.005Business PolicySpring 2025
BUSI 4940.007Business PolicySpring 2025
BUSI 4940.002Business PolicyFall 2024 Syllabus
MGMT 4660.403International Management PerspectivesFall 2024 Syllabus
MGMT 4660.501International Management PerspectivesFall 2024 Syllabus
MGMT 3720.411Organizational BehaviorFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

BUSI 4940.001Business PolicySpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MGMT 5300.002Entrepreneurship and Venture ManagementSpring 2024 SPOT
BUSI 4940.006Business PolicyFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Kuban, M. (2008). Alumni Perception of Student – Athlete Compensation: Implications for Fundraising. III (1) 98-108. Amsterdam, Radarweg 29, Netherlands, Elsevier BV.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE