Skip to main content

Mary Lutze

Title: Lecturer

Department: English

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Loyola University, 2020
    Major: English
    Dissertation: Recovering Humanity: The Metamorphosing Portait of Sensory Disability in Early Modern England

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ENGL 3430.001British Literature to 1780Spring 2026 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.004First Year Writing ISpring 2026 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 5320.001Studies in Composition TheoryFall 2025 SPOT
ENGL 4240.001Writing Center Theory and PracticeFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Lutze, M. (2023). Achieving Community Amid COVID-19.
  • Lutze, M., Warndof, J. (2022). Mask Wearing, Social Distancing, and Frequent Sanitization: Launching a University Writing Center During COVID-19.
  • Lutze, M. (2017). Advancing Accessibility: The ‘Radical Deaf Theatre’ of Aaron Sawyer’s The Vineyard.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE