Skip to main content

Mark A. Montemayor

Title: Associate Professor

Department: Music Education

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Washington, 2006
    Major: Music Education
  • MA, University of Washington, 1998
    Major: Music Education
  • BM, University of Texas at Austin, 1993
    Major: Music Studies

Current Scheduled Teaching

MUED 2996.001Honors College Mentored Research ExperienceSpring 2025
MUED 4209.001Music Performance: InstrumentalSpring 2025
MUED 4951.001Honors College Capstone ThesisFall 2024 Syllabus
MUED 4209.001Music Performance: InstrumentalFall 2024 Syllabus
MUED 6440.002Systematic Measurement of Music BehaviorsFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUED 5900.702Special ProblemsSummer 10W 2024 SPOT
MUED 2996.001Honors College Mentored Research ExperienceSpring 2024 Syllabus
MUED 4209.001Music Performance: InstrumentalSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4148.779Student Teaching for Music Education MajorsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDME 4103.779Student Teaching in Grades 4 8Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUED 4209.001Music Performance: InstrumentalFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUED 6440.001Systematic Measurement of Music BehaviorsFall 2023
MUGC 5900.702Special ProblemsSummer 10W 2023 SPOT
MUED 4209.001Music Performance: InstrumentalSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUED 5890.201Project PracticumSpring 2023
MUED 6900.704Special ProblemsSpring 2023
EDCI 4148.779Student Teaching for Music Education MajorsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDME 4103.779Student Teaching in Grades 4 8Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUED 5280.001Current Issues in Music EducationFall 2022 SPOT
MUED 4209.001Music Performance: InstrumentalFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUED 5890.201Project PracticumFall 2022
MUED 4910.708Special ProblemsFall 8W2 2022
MUED 5900.703Special ProblemsSummer 10W 2022 SPOT
MUED 4209.001Music Performance: InstrumentalSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUED 5900.701Special ProblemsSpring 2022
MUED 6440.001Systematic Measurement of Music BehaviorsSpring 2022 SPOT
MUED 5280.001Current Issues in Music EducationFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUGC 6950.728Doctoral DissertationFall 2021
MUED 4209.001Music Performance: InstrumentalFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUED 5900.701Special ProblemsSummer 10W 2021
MUGC 6950.715Doctoral DissertationSpring 2021
MUED 4209.002Music Performance: InstrumentalSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUED 6440.001Systematic Measurement of Music BehaviorsSpring 2021 SPOT
MUED 5500.001History of Music Education in the United StatesFall 2020 SPOT
MUED 4209.001Music Performance: InstrumentalFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book

  • Montemayor, M., Coppola, W., Mena, C.R. (2018). World music pedagogy, Vol. IV: Instrumental music education..
  • Book Chapter

  • Montemayor, M. (2006). John Zdechlik..
  • Montemayor, M. (2006). Philip Sparke..
  • Journal Article

  • Napoles, J., Montemayor, M.A., Silvey, B., Springer, G., Rinn, T.J. (2024). Burnout and Impostor Phenomenon among Undergraduate Music Education Majors. Journal of Research in Music Education. 72 (3) 229–246.
  • Silvey, B.A., Montemayor, M.A., Springer, D.G., Hall, F., Fears, R. Effects of model recordings on undergraduate conductors’ tempo selections. Journal of Research in Music Education.
  • Silvey, B.A., Montemayor, M.A., Davis, A. (2022). An examination of collegiate musicians’ ability to discern conductor intent. Psychology of Music.
  • Morrison, S.J., Himes, A.D., Montemayor, M.A., Springer, D.G. Is major minor? The relationship between music major status and a measure of musical sophistication. Journal of Research in Music Education.
  • Montemayor, M., Nápoles, J.A., Silvey, B.A., Wiese, L. (2022). Effects of score study and conducting gesture on collegiate musicians’ ability to detect errors in a choral score. Journal of Research in Music Education. 70 (4) 449-462.
  • Napoles, J., Montemayor, M., Silvey, B.A. (2021). The influences of facial expression and conducting gesture on college musicians’ perceptions of choral conductor and ensemble expressivity.. International Journal of Music Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761420926665
  • Silvey, B.A., Springer, D.G., Noon, C.M., Scherer, A., Baumgartner, C.M., Montemayor, M. (2020). Band directors’ perceptions of instrumental conducting curricula..
  • Montemayor, M., Silvey, B.A. (2019). Conductor expressivity affects evaluation of rehearsal instruction..
  • Silvey, B.A., Montemayor, M. (2017). An observational study of score study practices among undergraduate instrumental music education majors..
  • Montemayor, M., Silvey, B.A., Adams, A.L., Witt, K.L. (2016). Effects of internal and external focus of attention during novices’ instructional preparation on subsequent conducting and rehearsal behaviors..
  • Montemayor, M. (2016). Evaluation of intrarehearsal achievement by listeners of varying levels of expertise..
  • Montemayor, M., Silvey, B.A. (2014). Effects of internal and external focus of attention on novices’ rehearsal evaluations..
  • Montemayor, M. (2014). Evaluative and behavioral correlates to intrarehearsal achievement in high school bands..
  • Montemayor, M., Moss, E.A. (2009). Effect of recorded models on novice teachers’ rehearsal verbalizations, evaluations, and conducting..
  • Montemayor, M. (2008). Flauto: An ethnographic study of a highly successful private studio..
  • Montemayor, M. (2004). Jan Van der Roost..
  • Morrison, S.J., Montemayor, M., Wiltshire, E.S. (2004). The effect of a recorded model on band students’ performance self-evaluations, achievement, and attitude..
  • Magazine/Trade Publication

  • Montemayor, M. (2015). Research evangelism..
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE