Skip to main content

Michelle L. Buggs

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Counseling and Higher Education

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • EdD, University of North Texas, 2015
    Major: Higher Education
    Dissertation: The Relationship of Peer Leadership Emplyment to Academic Outcomes in Texas Institutions of Higher Education

Current Scheduled Teaching

EDHE 6710.400Organization and Administration of Higher EducationFall 2025 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDHE 6710.400Organization and Administration of Higher EducationFall 2024 SPOT
EDHE 6710.020Organization and Administration of Higher EducationFall 2023 SPOT
EDHE 6710.020Organization and Administration of Higher EducationFall 2022 SPOT
EDHE 6710.020Organization and Administration of Higher EducationFall 2021 SPOT
EDHE 6710.001Organization and Administration of Higher EducationFall 2018 SPOT
EDHE 6710.001Organization and Administration of Higher EducationFall 2017 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE