Skip to main content

Miranda B. Leddy

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Educational Psychology

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2017
    Major: Educational Psychology
    Specialization: Family Science
  • MA, Baylor University, 2014
    Major: American Studies
  • BA, Baylor University, 2012
    Major: Anthropology

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

HDFS 2033.020Parenting in Diverse FamiliesFall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 2033.021Parenting in Diverse FamiliesFall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 2033.020Parenting in Diverse FamiliesSummer 5W2 2017 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 2033.001Parenting in Diverse FamiliesSpring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 2033.020Parenting in Diverse FamiliesSpring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 2033.001Parenting in Diverse FamiliesFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
HDFS 2033.002Parenting in Diverse FamiliesFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
DFST 4133.001Adolescent DevelopmentSummer 5W2 2016 Syllabus SPOT
DFST 2033.002Parenting in Diverse FamiliesSpring 2016 Syllabus SPOT
DFST 2033.020Parenting in Diverse FamiliesSpring 2016 Syllabus SPOT
DFST 2033.001Parenting in Diverse FamiliesFall 2015 Syllabus SPOT
DFST 2033.002Parenting in Diverse FamiliesFall 2015 Syllabus SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Kim-Breunig, H., Leddy, M., Weast, A., Lisenbee, P. (2020). Enhancing literacy instruction of English language learners using apps..

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Leddy, M., "Families’ perspectives on family: Voices around the globe: Supporting internalization of UNT students and curriculum for a library repository.," University of North Texas, $641 Funded. ( - 2016).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE