Skip to main content

Minyi Chen

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • Diploma (International), Tongji University-China, 2020
    Major: Fundamental Mathematics

Current Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1190.205Business CalculusFall 2026 Syllabus
MATH 1190.206Business CalculusFall 2026 Syllabus
MATH 1190.207Business CalculusFall 2026 Syllabus
MATH 1190.208Business CalculusFall 2026 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1650.121Pre CalculusSpring 2026 SPOT
MATH 1650.122Pre CalculusSpring 2026 SPOT
MATH 1190.007Business CalculusSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Conference Proceeding

  • Chen, M., He, Y., Chavarri, I., Waldrop, L. Distance between m-functions in Dempster-Shafer Theory. In: Huynh, VN., Honda, K., Le, B., Inuiguchi, M., Huynh, H.T. (eds) Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modeling and Decision Making. IUKM 2025. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15586. Springer.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE