Skip to main content

Marcia C. McIntosh

Title: Associate Librarian

Department: Library - DL - Digital Projects

College: University of North Texas

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of Texas at Austin, 2014
    Major: Information Studies
  • BA, Washington University in St. Louis, 2012
    Major: English Literature & African and African American Studies

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Chapter

  • Golubiewski-Davis, K., Maisano, J., McIntosh, M.C., Moore, J., Niven, K., Rourk, W., Snyder, R. (2022). Chapter 2. Best Practices for 3D Data Preservation. 3D Data Creation to Curation: Community Standards for 3D Data Preservation. 16 - 85. Chicago, Illinois, Association of College and Research Libraries..
  • McIntosh, M.C., Boyer, D., Fernandez, R., Lassere, M., Moore, J., McManamon, F.P., Rozo, A., Swanson, T.P., Webbink, K. (2022). Chapter 3. Management and Storage of 3D Data. 3D Data Creation to Curation: Community Standards for 3D Data Preservation. 90 - 155. Chicago, Illinois, Association of College and Research Libraries.
  • Conference Proceeding

  • Harker, K.R., Keshmiripour, S., McIntosh, M.C., O'Toole, E.M., Sassen, C.J. (2019). Assessing the Success of a Mentoring Program for Academic Librarians. Library Assessment Conference 2018. Association of Research Libraries. https://libraryassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/44-Harker-et-al-AssessingTheSuccess.pdf
  • Journal Article

  • McIntosh, M.C., Mangum, M.J. (2022). Refining the process: An institutional approach to preparing projects for digitisation. 11 (1) 17. London, England, Henry Stewart Publications. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hsp/jdmm/2022/00000011/00000001/art00004
  • Jacobs, C.E., McIntosh, M., O'Sullivan, K.M. (2022). The Bibliographical Maker Movement. Knygotyra. (78) Vilnius University Press. https://www.journals.vu.lt/knygotyra/issue/view/2067
  • Jacobs, C.E., McIntosh, M., O'Sullivan, K.M. (2020). Make-Ready: Fabricating a Bibliographic Community. The Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy. (18)
  • Harker, K.R., Keshmiripour, S., McIntosh, M.C., O'Toole, E.M., Sassen, C.J. (2019). Mixed-Methods Assessment of a Mentoring Program. Journal of Library Administration. 59 (8) 873-902. Routledge. https://doi-org.libproxy.library.unt.edu/10.1080/01930826.2019.1661745
  • McIntosh, M.C., Mangum, M.J., Phillips, M.E. (2017). A Model for Surfacing Hidden Collections: The Rescuing Texas History Mini-Grant Program at the University of North Texas. 2 (2) 21. Buffalo, NY, The Reading Room: A Journal of Special Collections. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc987474/
  • Technical Report

  • McIntosh, M.C. (2017). Investigations into the Third Dimension: 3D Scanning in UNT Libraries’ Digital Collections. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc987458/

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Andrews, P. (Principal), McIntosh, M.C. (Co-Principal), Burns, D. (Supporting), "Digital Humanities Summer Institute Tuition," sponsored by Office for Faculty Success, University of North Texas, $1500 Funded. (2018 - 2019).
  • Willis, S.N. (Principal), McIntosh, M.C. (Supporting), "Cost and Feasibility of FADGI Compliance for the Digital Projects Unit," sponsored by University of North Texas, University of North Texas, $2441 Funded. (2016 - 2017).
  • McIntosh, M.C. (Principal), "Green Light to Greatness: Investigations into the Third Dimension: 3D Scanning in UNT Libraries Digital Collections," sponsored by UNT Libraries, University of North Texas, $3750 Funded. (2015 - 2016).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE