Skip to main content

Matthew Storm

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Marketing

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MBA, St. Edward's University, 2001
    Major: Business Administration
    Specialization: Human Resource Management
  • BS, Oklahoma State University, 1994
    Major: Accounting

Current Scheduled Teaching

MKTG 4890.501Applied Marketing ProblemsFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MKTG 4280.407Global Marketing Issues and PracticeSummer 5W2 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MKTG 4280.501Global Marketing Issues and PracticeSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MKTG 4280.501Global Marketing Issues and PracticeFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MKTG 4890.501Applied Marketing ProblemsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MKTG 4890.501Applied Marketing ProblemsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MKTG 4280.501Global Marketing Issues and PracticeFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MKTG 4890.501Applied Marketing ProblemsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MKTG 3651.501Foundations of Marketing Practice for Non Business MajorsFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MKTG 4890.001Applied Marketing ProblemsSummer 5W2 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE