Maryellen Dennis
Title: Adjunct Faculty
Department: Rehabilitation and Health Services
College: College of Health and Public Service
Curriculum Vitae
Curriculum Vitae LinkEducation
-
PhD, Capella University, 2021
Major: General Health Administration
Dissertation: Assessing Safety Attitudes to Improve Incident Reporting
-
MS, Capella University, 2016
Major: General Health Administration
Current Scheduled Teaching
| HLSV 5400.401 | Health Delivery Systems | Spring 2025 | ||
| HLSV 5450.401 | Health Services Administration | Spring 2025 | ||
| HLSV 5300.401 | Information Systems for Healthcare Management | Fall 2024 |
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
Previous Scheduled Teaching
| HLSV 5740.900 | Financial Issues in Health Services Administration | Summer 10W 2024 | SPOT | |
| HLSV 5400.901 | Health Delivery Systems | Spring 2024 | SPOT | |
| HLSV 5450.901 | Health Services Administration | Spring 2024 | SPOT | |
| HLSV 5300.901 | Information Systems for Healthcare Management | Fall 2023 | SPOT | |
| HLSV 5300.902 | Information Systems for Healthcare Management | Fall 2023 | SPOT | |
| HLSV 5400.901 | Health Delivery Systems | Spring 2023 | SPOT |
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
| Overall Summative Rating |
Challenge and Engagement Index |
Response Rate |
|---|---|---|
out of 5 |
out of 7 |
% of students responded |
-
Overall Summative Rating (median):
This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):- The course as a whole was
- The course content was
- The instructor’s contribution to the course was
- The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
-
Challenge and Engagement Index:
This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):- Do you expect your grade in this course to be
- The intellectual challenge presented was
- The amount of effort you put into this course was
- The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
- Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was