Skip to main content

Megan Schuth

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Technical Communication

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • Certificate, University of North Texas, 2014
    Major: Teaching Technical Writing
  • MA, University of North Texas, 2014
    Major: Professional and Technical Communication
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2003
    Major: Composition and Language

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

TECM 4250.003Writing Technical Procedures and ManualsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.035Technical WritingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 4250.001Writing Technical Procedures and ManualsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 4250.001Writing Technical Procedures and ManualsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 1700.005Introduction to Professional, Science, and Technical WritingFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.014Technical WritingFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
TECM 2700.026Technical WritingSpring 2015 Syllabus
TECM 2700.021Technical WritingFall 2014 Syllabus
TECM 2700.025Technical WritingFall 2014 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE