Skip to main content

Mario Sobrino

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Counseling and Higher Education

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Mississippi, 2023
    Major: Counselor Education
    Dissertation: "Buscando perdon: Validation and Considerations for a Spanish Translation of the Forgiveness and Reconciliation Inventory"
  • MS, Nova Southeastern University, 2019
    Major: Mental Health Counseling
  • BA, Florida Atlantic University, 2016
    Major: Psychology
  • BA, Florida Atlantic University, 2016
    Major: Sociology

Current Scheduled Teaching

COUN 5610.001Addiction CounselingSpring 2025
COUN 5480.001Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in CounselingSpring 2025

Previous Scheduled Teaching

COUN 5610.001Addiction CounselingFall 2024 SPOT
COUN 5480.001Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in CounselingFall 2024 SPOT
COUN 5610.001Addiction CounselingSummer 10W 2024 SPOT
COUN 5610.013Addiction CounselingSummer 10W 2024 SPOT
COUN 5790.001Counseling Culturally Diverse ClientsSummer 10W 2024 SPOT
COUN 5610.001Addiction CounselingSpring 2024 SPOT
COUN 5610.001Addiction CounselingFall 2023 SPOT
COUN 5480.001Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in CounselingFall 2023 SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Sobrino, M., Coleman, M.L., Springfield, J., Neal, S., Winburn, A. (2023). Examining Telemental Health in Mississippi: Brief Report. Other. 8 (1) eGrove Press. https://doi.org/10.56731/2688-3996.1066
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE