Skip to main content

Mary McCulley

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: English

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Texas Christian University, 2016
    Major: English
  • MA, Texas State University, 2008
    Major: Rhetoric & Composition
  • BA, Texas State University, 2006
    Major: English

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ENGL 1320.001First Year Writing IISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1320.004First Year Writing IISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1320.029First Year Writing IISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1320.063First Year Writing IISpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.072First Year Writing IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.205First Year Writing IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ENGL 1310.219First Year Writing IFall 2023 SPOT
ENGL 1310.236First Year Writing IFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
TSIW 1300Z.205Integrated Reading/Writing NCBOFall 2023 Syllabus
TSIW 1300Z.219Integrated Reading/Writing NCBOFall 2023 Syllabus
TSIW 1300Z.236Integrated Reading/Writing NCBOFall 2023 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE