Skip to main content

Mark Tempesta

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Vocal Studies

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • DMA, New England Conservatory of Music, 2024
    Major: Vocal Performance & Pedagogy

Current Scheduled Teaching

MUAG 5610.001Comparative Pedagogy of SingingSpring 2025
MUGC 6944.709Graduate Artist Certificate RecitalSpring 2025
MUAG 4900.754Special ProblemsSpring 2025
MUAM 1503.701VoiceSpring 2025
MUAM 6503.701VoiceSpring 2025
MUAS 3503.701VoiceSpring 2025
MUAG 4300.001Science and Pedagogy of SingingFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 4310.001Science and Pedagogy of SingingFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 5300.001Science and Pedagogy of SingingFall 2024 SPOT
MUAC 1503.701VOICEFall 2024 SPOT
MUAC 3503.701VOICEFall 2024 SPOT
MUAC 6503.701VOICEFall 2024 SPOT
MUAM 1503.701VoiceFall 2024 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Tempesta, M. (Principal), Aaen, M. (Supporting), "Global Venture Fund," University of North Texas, $3000 Funded. (2024 - 2024).
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE