Skip to main content

Magdalena Grohman

Title: Clinical Associate Professor

Department: Multidisciplinary Innovation

College: College of Applied and Collaborative Studies

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Jagiellonian University, 2004
    Major: Psychology
    Specialization: Cognitive Psychology, Creativity
  • MA, Jagiellonian University, 1998
    Major: Psychology
    Specialization: Cognitive Psychology, Creativity

Current Scheduled Teaching

CACS 2030.501Creativity and Complex ProblemsFall 2024 Syllabus
BAAS 3020.703Fundamentals of Inquiry and DiscoveryFall 8W1 2024 Syllabus
BAAS 3000.703Pathways to Civic EngagementFall 8W2 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

SPDA 2030.501Applied Design ThinkingSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
SPDA 3220.521Connections II: Team CreativitySpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
SPDA 3030.501Applied Design Principles and PracticesFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
SPDA 2030.511Applied Design ThinkingFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
SPDA 4020.531Connections III: Cultural ContextsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
SPDA 3030.510Applied Design Principles and PracticesSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
SPDA 2030.501Applied Design ThinkingSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Conference Proceeding

  • Grohman, M.G., Brown, M.J., Gans, N., Edwards, J.G. (2023). Student learning experiences in the research lab: Qualitative analysis of two types of leadership-mentorship styles.. Baltimore, American Society for Engineering Education.

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Grohman, M.G. (Principal), Brown, M.J. (Co-Principal), Gans, N. (Co-Principal), "The formation of engineers in the research lab: A cognitive ethnography study," sponsored by National Science Foundation, Federal, $21004 Funded. (2023 - 2024).
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE