Skip to main content

Marc J. Foster

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Mathematics

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2018
    Major: Mathematics
  • BS, Angelo State University, 2013
    Major: Mathematics

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MATH 1190.400Business CalculusSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1190.410Business CalculusSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1650.330Pre CalculusSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1190.410Business CalculusFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1190.501Business CalculusFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1190.501Business CalculusSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1180.410College Math for Business, Economics and Related FieldsSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1680.140Elementary Probability and StatisticsFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1680.141Elementary Probability and StatisticsFall 2018 Syllabus
MATH 1680.142Elementary Probability and StatisticsFall 2018 Syllabus
MATH 1680.143Elementary Probability and StatisticsFall 2018 Syllabus
MATH 1580.007Survey of Mathematics with ApplicationsSpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1680.110Elementary Probability and StatisticsSummer 10W 2017 Syllabus SPOT
MATH 1680.111Elementary Probability and StatisticsSummer 10W 2017 Syllabus
MATH 1680.112Elementary Probability and StatisticsSummer 10W 2017 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE