Skip to main content

Muthukudage Kumara

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Computer Science and Engineering

College: College of Engineering

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2013
    Major: Computer Science and Engineering
    Dissertation: Automated Real-time Objects Detection in Colonoscopy Videos for Quality Measurements
  • MS, University of North Texas, 2012
    Major: Computer Science

Current Scheduled Teaching

CSCE 5370.001Distributed & Parallel Database SystemsFall 2024
CSCE 5370.002Distributed & Parallel Database SystemsFall 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

CSCE 3110.001Data Structures and AlgorithmsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
CSCE 5300.002Introduction to Big Data and Data ScienceSpring 2024 SPOT
CSCE 5290.005Natural Language ProcessingFall 2023 SPOT
CSCE 5430.010Software EngineeringFall 2023 SPOT
CSCE 5390.001Multimedia ComputingSummer 10W 2023 SPOT
CSCE 5430.001Software EngineeringSpring 2023 SPOT
CSCE 5465.002Usability Testing in Software EngineeringSpring 2023 SPOT
CSCE 5200.003Information Retrieval and Web SearchFall 2022 SPOT
CSCE 5430.005Software EngineeringFall 2022 SPOT
CSCE 5390.001Multimedia ComputingSummer 10W 2022 SPOT
CSCE 5390.002Multimedia ComputingSummer 8W2 2022 SPOT
CSCE 5350.002Fundamentals of Database SystemsFall 2021 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE