Skip to main content

Jacob J. Mangum

Title: Associate Librarian

Department: Library - Digital Libraries & External Relations

College: University of North Texas

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MLS, University of North Texas, 2015
    Major: Library Science
  • BS, University of North Texas, 2013
    Major: Information Science
    Specialization: Anthropology

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • McIntosh, M.C., Mangum, M.J. (2022). Refining the process: An institutional approach to preparing projects for digitisation. 11 (1) 17. London, England, Henry Stewart Publications. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hsp/jdmm/2022/00000011/00000001/art00004
  • McIntosh, M.C., Mangum, M.J., Phillips, M.E. (2017). A Model for Surfacing Hidden Collections: The Rescuing Texas History Mini-Grant Program at the University of North Texas. 2 (2) 21. Buffalo, NY, The Reading Room: A Journal of Special Collections. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc987474/

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Krahmer, A.J., Phillips, M.E., Mangum, M.J. (Supporting), "Textreasures Impact Grant," sponsored by Texas State Libraries and Archives Commission, State, $6499.00 Funded. (2017 - 2018).
  • Krahmer, A.J., Phillips, M.E., Mangum, J. (Supporting), "Textreasures Impact Grant," sponsored by Texas State Libraries and Archives Commission, State, Funded. (2017 - 2018).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE