Faculty Profile

Jacob Mangum

Title
Associate Librarian
Department
Library - Digital Libraries & External Relations
College
University of North Texas

    

Education

MLS, University of North Texas, 2015.
Major: Library Science
BS, University of North Texas, 2013.
Major: Information Science
Degree Specialization: Anthropology

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

No previous courses available.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Journal Article
McIntosh, M. C., Mangum, M. J. (2022). Refining the process: An institutional approach to preparing projects for digitisation. 11(1), 17. London, England: Henry Stewart Publications. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hsp/jdmm/2022/00000011/00000001/art00004
McIntosh, M. C., Mangum, M. J., Phillips, M. E. (2017). A Model for Surfacing Hidden Collections: The Rescuing Texas History Mini-Grant Program at the University of North Texas. 2(2), 21. Buffalo, NY: The Reading Room: A Journal of Special Collections. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc987474/

Awarded Grants

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

Grant - Research
Krahmer, A. J., Phillips, M. E., Mangum, M. J. (Supporting), "Textreasures Impact Grant," Sponsored by Texas State Libraries and Archives Commission, State, $6499.00 Funded. (September 1, 2017August 31, 2018).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE