Faculty Profile

Maryam Khatami

Title
Assistant Professor
Department
Information Technology and Decision Sciences
College
College of Business

    

    

      


                          

            
Curriculum Vitae

            

              Click Here to View Faculty CV
            

          

        
                          

            
Education

            



  

  


  
PhD, Texas A&M University, 2020. 
Major: Industrial Engineering





          

        
                

          
Current Scheduled Teaching*


          
No current or future courses scheduled.


          
*
  Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of
  higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for
  undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
  

        

      

    

  


    

    

      


        


          


            
Previous Scheduled Teaching*


            
                    

                    DSCI 5260.005, Business Process Analytics, Spring 2024 Syllabus
                    

                    DSCI 5260.501, Business Process Analytics, Spring 2024 Syllabus
                    

                    DSCI 5260.004, Business Process Analytics, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
                    

                    DSCI 5260.501, Business Process Analytics, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT

          


          
*
  Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of
  higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for
  undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
  

        

      

    

  

  
  	

	

	  

		

		   
Published Publications



  

  
Published Intellectual Contributions


  
Journal Article
Khatami, M., Stauffer, J., Lawley, M.  How a Dedicated Post-discharge Unit can Reduce Hospital Congestion and Costs. Decision Sciences. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12624
Khatami, M., Alvarado, M., Kong, N., Parikh, P., Lawley, M.  (2022). Inpatient discharge planning under uncertainty. IIE Transactions. 54(4), 332-347. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/24725854.2021.1943764
Khatami, M., Asgari, N., Jamshidi, M., Zanjirani Farahani, R.  (2017). A memetic algorithm for a multi-objective obnoxious waste location-routing problem: a case study. Annals of Operations Research. 250, 279-308. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-016-2248-7
Khatami, M., Mahootchi, M., Zanjirani Farahani, R.  (2015). Benders’ decomposition for concurrent redesign of forward and closed-loop supply chain network with demand and return uncertainties. Transportation Journal Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 79, 1-21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1366554515000630



	
		
		
	  

	

	

  
    
	

	

	  

		

		   	
		
		
	  

	

	

	
	

  
  
  

  	

		

		,  
			
				

					
					Overall
Summative Rating		
					Challenge and
Engagement Index		
					Response Rate
					
				

			
			
				

					
					
out of 5		
					
out of 7		
					%
 of 
students responded		
					
					
				

			
		


		
    
			
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    
			This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
				
      
					
    • The course as a whole was
      • 
					
    • The course content was
      • 
					
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
      • 
					
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
      • 
				
    
			
    • 
			
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    
			This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
				
      
					
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
      • 
					
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
      • 
					
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
      • 
					
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
      • 
					
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
      • 
				
    
			
    • 
		

		CLOSE