Skip to main content

Maryam Khatami

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Information Technology and Decision Sciences

College: College of Business

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, Texas A&M University, 2020
    Major: Industrial Engineering

Current Scheduled Teaching

DSCI 5260.001Business Process AnalyticsSpring 2025
DSCI 5260.501Business Process AnalyticsSpring 2025
DSCI 5260.004Business Process AnalyticsFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

DSCI 5260.005Business Process AnalyticsSpring 2024 SPOT
DSCI 5260.501Business Process AnalyticsSpring 2024 SPOT
DSCI 5260.004Business Process AnalyticsFall 2023 SPOT
DSCI 5260.501Business Process AnalyticsFall 2023 SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Khatami, M. (2024). Risk-averse Multistage Stochastic Programs with Expected Conditional Risk Measures. Computers & Operations Research. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305054824002740
  • Khatami, M., Stauffer, J., Lawley, M. How a Dedicated Post-discharge Unit can Reduce Hospital Congestion and Costs. Decision Sciences. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12624
  • Khatami, M., Alvarado, M., Kong, N., Parikh, P., Lawley, M. (2022). Inpatient discharge planning under uncertainty. IIE Transactions. 54 (4) 332-347. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/24725854.2021.1943764
  • Khatami, M., Asgari, N., Jamshidi, M., Zanjirani Farahani, R. (2017). A memetic algorithm for a multi-objective obnoxious waste location-routing problem: a case study. Annals of Operations Research. 250 279-308. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-016-2248-7
  • Khatami, M., Mahootchi, M., Zanjirani Farahani, R. (2015). Benders’ decomposition for concurrent redesign of forward and closed-loop supply chain network with demand and return uncertainties. Transportation Journal Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 79 1-21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1366554515000630
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE