Faculty Profile

Marilyn Wiley

Title
Dean
Department
Finance, Insurance, Real Estate and Law
College
College of Business

    

Education

PhD, Texas A & M University, 1993.
Major: Finance
MS, University of Houston, Clear Lake, 1983.
Major: Finance
MBA, University of Houston, Clear Lake, 1982.
BBA, University of Texas at Arlington, 1972.
Major: Marketing

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

FINA 5040.002, Introduction to Finance and Financial Mathematics, Spring 8W1 2015
FINA 5040.080, Introduction to Finance and Financial Mathematics, Spring MA 2015
FINA 5040.002, Introduction to Finance and Financial Mathematics, Fall 2014
FINA 5040.002, Introduction to Finance and Financial Mathematics, Spring 2014
FINA 5040.080, Introduction to Finance and Financial Mathematics, Spring MA 2014
FINA 5040.002, Introduction to Finance and Financial Mathematics, Fall 2013
FINA 5040.002, Introduction to Finance and Financial Mathematics, Spring 2013
FINA 4200.001, Investments, Spring 2012
FINA 4200.004, Investments, Fall 2011
FINA 4200.002, Investments, Spring 2011
FINA 4200.001, Investments, Fall 2010
FINA 4200.002, Investments, Spring 2010
FINA 4200.001, Investments, Fall 2009

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE