Skip to main content

Marcy Bishop

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Design

College: College of Visual Arts and Design

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MFA, University of North Texas, 2015
    Major: Studio Arts- Painting and Drawing
  • BA, University of North Carolina at Pembroke, 2013
    Major: Art Education

Current Scheduled Teaching

UCAR 1000Z.429Career Readiness Seminar ISpring 2025
UCAR 1000Z.429Career Readiness Seminar IFall 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

UCAR 1000Z.029Career Readiness Seminar ISpring 2024
UCAR 1000Z.029Career Readiness Seminar IFall 2023
UCAR 1000Z.029Career Readiness Seminar ISpring 2023
UCAR 1000Z.032Career Readiness Seminar ISpring 2023
UCAR 1000Z.027Career Readiness Seminar IFall 2022
ART 1500.501Drawing ISummer 5W1 2018 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1450.303Design IISpring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1440.301Design IFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1440.302Design IFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1440.303Design IFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1440.310Design IFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1440.502Design ISummer 5W2 2016 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1450.511Design IISpring 2016 SPOT
ART 1440.507Design IFall 2015 SPOT
ART 1440.510Design IFall 2015 SPOT
ART 1500.501Drawing ISummer 5W2 2015 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1510.508Drawing IISpring 2015
ART 1510.509Drawing IISpring 2015
ART 1500.509Drawing IFall 2014
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE