Skip to main content

Meredith L. Cawley

Title: Lecturer

Department: Art Foundations

College: College of Visual Arts and Design

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MFA, University of Houston, 2016
    Major: Art

Current Scheduled Teaching

ART 2020.007Digital Tools and Technologies for Creative PracticeFall 2024 Syllabus
ART 1600.202Foundations: Perception and TranslationFall 2024 Syllabus
ART 1600.402Foundations: Perception and TranslationFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ART 1900.401Foundations: Systems and TransformationsSummer 5W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1900.001Foundations: Systems and TransformationsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1900.102Foundations: Systems and TransformationsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1900.104Foundations: Systems and TransformationsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1900.001Foundations: Systems and TransformationsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1900.101Foundations: Systems and TransformationsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1900.102Foundations: Systems and TransformationsFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2020.001Digital Tools and Technologies for Creative PracticeSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2020.004Digital Tools and Technologies for Creative PracticeSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1900.002Foundations: Systems and TransformationsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1900.208Foundations: Systems and TransformationsSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2020.001Digital Tools and Technologies for Creative PracticeFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2020.004Digital Tools and Technologies for Creative PracticeFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2020.006Digital Tools and Technologies for Creative PracticeFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1800.001Foundations: Narrative and RepresentationFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1800.114Foundations: Narrative and RepresentationFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1700.301Foundations: Space (physical, temporal and virtual)Summer 5W1 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1900.301Foundations: Systems and TransformationsSummer 5W2 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2020.001Digital Tools and Technologies for Creative PracticeSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2020.003Digital Tools and Technologies for Creative PracticeSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1800.002Foundations: Narrative and RepresentationSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2020.003Digital Tools and Technologies for Creative PracticeFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1800.001Foundations: Narrative and RepresentationFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1800.106Foundations: Narrative and RepresentationFall 2021 SPOT
ART 1700.301Foundations: Space (physical, temporal and virtual)Summer 5W1 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1700.401Foundations: Space (physical, temporal and virtual)Summer 5W1 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ART 2020.002Digital Tools and Technologies for Creative PracticeSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1800.311Foundations: Narrative and RepresentationSpring 2021 SPOT
ART 1800.404Foundations: Narrative and RepresentationFall 2020 SPOT
ART 1800.405Foundations: Narrative and RepresentationFall 2020 SPOT
ART 1800.407Foundations: Narrative and RepresentationFall 2020 SPOT
ART 1450.302Design IISpring 2020 Syllabus
ART 1450.516Design IISpring 2020
ART 1450.508Design IIFall 2019 SPOT

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Fellowship

  • Cawley, M.L., "2024-2025 Special Collections Research Fellowship," sponsored by UNT Special Collections, International, $1000 Funded. (2024).
  • Grant - Teaching

  • Cawley, M.L. (Co-Principal), "Cornerstone Grant," sponsored by University of North Texas, University of North Texas, $2500 Funded. (2023).
  • Cawley, M.L. (Co-Principal), "Special Collections Coursework Development Grant," sponsored by UNT Libraries Special Collections, University of North Texas, $1000 Funded. (2021 - 2022).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE