Skip to main content

Michael L. Conrady

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Keyboard Studies

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

MUAG 4900.705Special ProblemsFall 2024
MUAG 5900.708SPECIAL PROBLEMSFall 2024
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUSM 5286.001Music Ministry in the Postmodern ContextFall 2023 SPOT
MUAG 4740.001Seminar in Church MusicFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
MUSM 5284.001Foundations and History of Sacred MusicFall 2022 SPOT
MUAG 4740.001Seminar in Church MusicFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
MUSM 5286.001Music Ministry in the Postmodern ContextFall 2021 SPOT
MUAG 4740.001Seminar in Church MusicFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUSM 5285.001Introduction to Congregational SongSpring 2021
MUAG 4740.001Seminar in Church MusicSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
MUGC 5900.703Special ProblemsSpring 2021
MUSM 5284.001Foundations and History of Sacred MusicFall 2020 SPOT
MUAG 4740.001Seminar in Church MusicFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
MUAG 4740.001Seminar in Church MusicSpring 2020 Syllabus
MUSM 5287.001Western Sacred Music in the Renaissance, Baroque, and Classical ErasSpring 2020
MUAG 4740.001Seminar in Church MusicFall 2019 SPOT
MUSM 5288.001Western Sacred Music in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries and Conjectures as to Its FutureFall 2019 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE