Skip to main content

Michael Forst

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Honors College

College: University of North Texas

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, University of Alabama, 2015
    Major: Communication Studies
    Dissertation: Understanding Marginalized Queer Voices: An Ethnography of LBGTQ Spaces.
  • BS, University of Alabama, 2013
    Major: Economics

Current Scheduled Teaching

HNRS 4200Z.002Honors Experiential Learning SeminarFall 2025
HNRS 4200Z.003Honors Experiential Learning SeminarFall 2025
HNRS 4200Z.004Honors Experiential Learning SeminarFall 2025
HNRS 1000.004Honors First Year SeminarFall 2025
HNRS 1000.005Honors First Year SeminarFall 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

HNRS 4200Z.002Honors Experiential Learning SeminarFall 2024 SPOT
HNRS 4200Z.003Honors Experiential Learning SeminarFall 2024 SPOT
HNRS 4200Z.004Honors Experiential Learning SeminarFall 2024 SPOT
HNRS 1000.004Honors First Year SeminarFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE